Three new gaming monitors were unveiled at Computex, each pushing the boundaries of refresh rates. The Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG stands out with its 1080p resolution and an astonishing 610Hz refresh rate. Meanwhile, both MSI and Acer have introduced 1440p displays that boast 500Hz refresh rates, which are challenging to drive even with top-tier hardware like an RTX 5090 and multi-frame generation.
Acer's offering, the Predator X27U F5, combines speed with a QD-OLED panel for exceptional color accuracy. Initially, it will launch in Europe and China, starting at €899. Acer has confirmed plans to bring the monitor to the US but has not disclosed pricing due to ongoing tariff negotiations. Given the rising cost of tech products, the US price might be on the higher side.
MSI's 27-inch MPG 271QR X50 also features a QD-OLED panel, though pricing remains under wraps. An intriguing AI feature sets this monitor apart: a sensor at the bottom detects when you step away, sending data to a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to automatically turn off the display and initiate burn-in protection. This AI-driven approach to preventing burn-in, a common concern for OLED displays, especially in gaming scenarios with static images, adds a modern twist to an essential feature.
Do Gaming Monitors Need to Be This Fast?
The introduction of monitors with such high refresh rates, like the Asus ROG Strix Ace XG248QSG's 610Hz, raises questions about necessity. Even with technologies like Nvidia's multi-frame generation pushing frame rates, achieving 610Hz at 1080p would require an RTX 5090 and possibly multi-frame generation, which is generally not recommended for competitive gaming due to added latency.
To fully utilize these high refresh rates, a powerful CPU is crucial. The CPU must supply the GPU with data fast enough to maintain these frame rates. While technologies like Nvidia Reflex and frame generation help, at around 600 fps, a robust CPU is essential.
The advantage of such high frame rates lies in the significantly reduced render latency, which is critical in competitive gaming. For example, in games like Counter-Strike 2, players often opt for the lowest settings to maximize frame rates and minimize input lag, which can be the deciding factor in competitive play. However, whether these benefits justify the likely high cost of these monitors remains a significant consideration for most gamers.
